An AARP article that discusses common surgeries to avoid – including spinal fusion – has recently made its way back into the headlines. Specifically, it cites studies that show the frequency of this procedure has increased 1,400 percent between 2002 and 2007, and does not appear to be slowing down. The article suggests that the surgery is dangerous and is no more effective than physical therapy, which is inaccurate and misleading. Spinal fusion involves the joining of two or more vertebrae together, using screws and rods along with bone graft material, and sometimes cages (devices that support the vertebra).  These techniques provide strong support for the spine, as well as correction of alignment and protection of the spinal canal and nerves. While spinal fusion has increased in frequency, in my experience it is a safe and highly effective treatment for patients when performed properly and for the right diagnosis. The key to success is careful selection of the patients who need a fusion (i.e., performing the procedure for the correct diagnosis), and also performing the surgery carefully to achieve maximal success (i.e., achieving a solid fusion). Where patients and doctors get into problems is when the procedure is performed for a